FAIR Epigraphic Vocabularies

Welcome to the home of standardised vocabularies for digital epigraphy—where ancient inscriptions meet modern data practices.

This resource provides consolidated community-wide standards implemented as part of the Linked Open Data ecosystem, comprising two main elements: controlled vocabularies and ontology. You can currently access and test the first stage of our controlled vocabularies, with new terms being continuously added and updated throughout 2025.

The controlled vocabularies are available to download as an RDF Turtle file, together with their VoID file (The Vocabulary of Interlinked Datasets). The controlled vocabulary is made available as a Linked Open Data (LOD) resource, accessible online with stable Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), developed by the FAIR Epigraphy Project and hosted by the Centre for the Study of Ancient Documents at the University of Oxford .

Found an issue or want to suggest improvements? Use the Issues functionality in the top right corner of each vocabulary page. We appreciate your feedback!


What Are Controlled Vocabularies in Epigraphy?

Controlled vocabularies provide a consistent and objective way to describe epigraphic data and define their exact meaning across projects and disciplines. They represent standardised and organised terms, often structured hierarchically with broader and narrower terms, definitions, and alternative labels in multiple languages.

In the world of Linked Open Data, these vocabularies serve as authoritative reference points for researchers and project administrators—stable references that precisely describe concepts or phenomena being recorded in epigraphic studies.

How These Vocabularies Help Your Work

For Researchers

Standardise terminology across your publications and databases, enabling more precise cross-collection searching and data integration.

For Digital Projects

Implement consistent data structures that connect to the broader epigraphic ecosystem, enhancing interoperability and data longevity.

For Students & Educators

Access clearly defined terminology that bridges traditional epigraphic scholarship with modern digital methods.

From EAGLE to FAIR: The Evolution of Epigraphic Vocabularies

The Need for Standardization

The creation of updated controlled epigraphic vocabularies has been identified by the community as essential for implementing FAIR and Open Science principles in epigraphy (Tupman 2021; Heřmánková et al. 2022). Our work consolidates and extends the groundbreaking efforts of the EAGLE Europeana Project (2013-2016) while aligning with current standards of FAIR Epigraphy Project partners.

Addressing Previous Limitations

While the EAGLE vocabularies represented an important step forward, community discussions during Epigraphy.info meetings revealed several limitations:

  • Lack of hierarchical structure
  • Duplication across language versions
  • Insufficient explanations and examples
  • Conflation of text function and monument type
  • Limited searchability and accessibility

Our Approach: Bottom-Up and FAIR

The FAIR Epigraphic Vocabularies represent a 'bottom-up' application that employs a multifaceted hierarchic categorisation system. This approach allows for multiple conceptual frameworks while recognising the complex and multilingual nature of inscriptions and the discipline's historiography. The proposed FAIR epigraphic controlled vocabularies present a consolidation of work conducted by the EAGLE Europeana Project in 2013-2016 (Liuzzo et al. 2013; Liuzzo 2015; Liuzzo and Evangelisti 2021) and an alignment of current standards of partner projects of the FAIR Epigraphy Project (https://inscriptiones.org/).

Furthermore, our vocabulary adheres to the principles of FAIR data (Wilkinson et al. 2016), emphasising:

  • Findability: Easy discovery through clear organization
  • Accessibility: Open access with stable URIs
  • Interoperability: Connection to broader heritage and linguistic ontologies
  • Reusability: Clear definitions and provenance information

This approach facilitates efficient collaboration, linking, and cross-referencing, enabling researchers to build upon each other's work and explore epigraphy in a structured and accessible manner across project boundaries. Overall, this initiative enhances the research landscape in epigraphy by fostering cooperation and providing a reliable and standardised resource for scholars in the field.



Vocabulary Categories

The FAIR Epigraphic Vocabularies build upon seven core categories, with three unique to epigraphy and four shared with other disciplines:

Epigraphy-Specific Categories

Type of Inscription/Function

Classifications based on the purpose and content of inscribed texts

Object Type

Classifications of physical objects bearing inscriptions

Execution Technique

Methods used to create inscriptions on various surfaces

Shared Categories

Material

Physical substances on which inscriptions appear

Decoration

Visual elements accompanying inscribed text

Dating Terminology

Chronological classification systems

State of Preservation

Condition assessment terminology for inscribed objects

Language & Multilingualism

Terminology for describing linguistic features (newly added based on LatinNow work)


How These Vocabularies Serve the Community

The application of computational and statistical methods benefits greatly from controlled vocabularies. They provide a foundation for creating structured and reliable datasets, which is crucial for rigorous analysis and large-scale comparative research.

For Epigraphers & Content Creators

  • Standardize descriptive terminology across publications
  • Connect your data to the wider epigraphic ecosystem
  • Enhance discoverability of your research

For IT Personnel & Digital Curators

  • Implement proven data structures for epigraphic content
  • Utilize stable URIs for persistent references
  • Connect to broader semantic web resources

For Researchers & Students

  • Access consistent terminology across multiple projects
  • Understand nuanced classifications with clear definitions
  • Conduct cross-collection research with greater precision

For Teachers & Educational Settings

  • Provide students with clear definitional frameworks
  • Connect traditional methodology with digital approaches
  • Illustrate conceptual relationships through vocabulary hierarchies

For GLAM Sector & Museum Curators

  • Align museum cataloging with scholarly standards
  • Connect collection data to the broader research ecosystem
  • Enhance discoverability and contextualization of inscribed objects

Join the FAIR Epigraphy Efforts

The FAIR Epigraphic Vocabularies represent an ongoing collaborative effort. As we continue to expand and refine these resources throughout 2025, we welcome your expertise and feedback.

Whether you're implementing these vocabularies in your project, teaching with them, or using them for research, we'd like to hear about your experience.

Ways to Contribute

  • Submit issues or suggestions via GitHub
  • Join the Epigraphy.info working groups on specific vocabulary domains
  • Share case studies of vocabulary implementation
  • Participate in the community discussions
Contact Us

Bibliography & Further Reading

These resources provide foundational knowledge and current research in both traditional epigraphy and digital approaches to epigraphic data. They inform our vocabulary development and may assist users in understanding the scholarly context of our work.

Digital Epigraphy & FAIR Principles

Resources on digital approaches to epigraphy and implementing FAIR principles for epigraphic data.

  • Heřmánková, P., Horster, M., and Prag, J. (2022) "Digital Epigraphy in 2022: A Report from the Scoping Survey of the FAIR Epigraphy Project (v1.0.0)". Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6610696
  • Tupman, C. (2021) 'Where Can Our Inscriptions Take Us? Harnessing the Potential of Linked Open Data for Epigraphy', in I. Velasquéz Soriano and D. Espinosa Espinosa (eds) Epigraphy in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges in the Recording, Analysis and Dissemination of Inscriptions. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 115–128.
  • Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Mons, B., et al. (2016) "The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship", Scientific Data 3 (1), 1‑9.

Data Harmonization & Semantic Web for Epigraphy

Research on standardising epigraphic vocabularies and implementing semantic web technologies.

  • Liuzzo, P.M., Fasolini, D. and Rocco, A. (2013) Content harmonisation guidelines, including GIS and terminologies - Second Release (D 2.2.2, version n 4.0). Deliverable: Europeana network of Ancient Greek and Latin Epigraphy. Available at: EAGLE Network (PDF)
  • Liuzzo, P.M. (2015) "EAGLE and EUROPEANA: Architecture Problems for Aggregation and Harmonization", Proceedings of the Symposium on Cultural Heritage Markup. Balisage Series on Markup Technologies, 16. http://doi.org/10.4242/BalisageVol16.Liuzzo01
  • Liuzzo, P.M. and Evangelisti, S. (2021) 'Modeling execution techniques of inscriptions', Semantic Web. Edited by A. Bikakis et al., 12(2), pp. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-200395

Latin Epigraphy Handbooks

Fundamental reference works for Latin epigraphic methodology and analysis.

  • Cagnat, R. (1914) Cours d'épigraphie latine. 4e. éd., revue et augmentée. Paris: Fontemoing.
  • Calabi Limentani, Ida. (1991) Epigrafia latina. 4. ed. Milano: Cisalpino, Istituto Editoriale Universitario (Manuali Cisalpino; 3).
  • Cooley, A.E. (2012) The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Di Stefano Manzella, Ivan. (1987) Mestiere di epigrafista: guida alla schedatura del materiale epigrafico lapideo. Roma: Quasar (Vetera; 1).
  • Lassère, J.-Marie. (2005) Manuel d'épigraphie romaine. Paris: Picard (Antiquité/Synthèses; 8.).

Greek Epigraphy Handbooks

Essential reference works for Greek epigraphic methods and analysis.

  • Guarducci, Margherita. (1967) Epigrafia greca. Rome: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato, Libreria dello Stato. https://biblio.inscriptiones.org/epig10000193
  • McLean, B. (2003) An Introduction to Greek Epigraphy of the Hellenistic and Roman Periods from Alexander the Great Down to the Reign of Constantine (323 B.C.-A.D. 337). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Reinach, S., 1858-1932 (1885) Traité d'épigraphie grecque. France: E. Leroux, 1885.
  • Woodhead, A.G. (1959) The study of Greek inscriptions. Cambridge.